From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Obama Deports More Than 3 Times As Many Illegals And Nothing From The Bishops?
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:45:23 -0600
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 13:48:17 -0800, Alan says...
>
> On 2025-11-13 05:12, AlleyCat wrote:
> >
> > What kind of fucked up shit is that, SpermMan?
> >
> > On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 07:11:53 -0500 (EST), Bradley K. Sherman says...
> >
> >>
> >> |
> >> | Catholic Bishops Rebuke U.S. 'Mass Deportation' of
> >> | Immigrants
> >
> > The man who deported MANY more than Trump, and killed 100s, if not thousands
> > more people than Trump ever though of killing, gets a Peace Prize?
> Rates still completely confuse you...
Nope.
"Rates" are what embarrassed liberal faggots use as an excuse to make a city
with 700 murders seem safer than one with 7.
I don't hear of you going on vacation and walking through the South side
Chicago at 3:00AM. Stay in your lakehouse, limousine liberal.
Two murders a night is not safer than one every 52 days.
How's THAT for rate, faggot?
I don't care HOW many people live in Chicago. Those "rates" YOU speak of, are
misleading. To say Chicago is safer than somewhere else because the murder
"rate" is lower, is bullshit. They count EVERYONE within the city limits.
You can't count the people who live in the safer areas... they don't have the
crime the unsafe neighborhoods do, so to include them with the murderous
Democrat areas is simple disingenuousness.
Take the more law-abiding areas out of the equation, and the rate skyrockets.
You rate retards are basically lying when you include "safe" people and
neighborhoods in with those that are not.
Take the WHITE areas of Chicago out of the equation, and you'd get what you'd
expect.
Chicago is NOT "safer". The ONLY reason the murder rate isn't higher, is
because there are a LOT of people living in safer areas.
If we separated neighborhoods and areas, and gave them their OWN rates...?
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/sTm9mfy-tkk?feature=share
https://x.com/OANN/status/1963858146272924015
53 people were shot in Chicago over the weekend (so safe!)
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1962583436217983192
Chicago Police Recover Nearly 5,200 Illegal Guns So Far
more?
=============================================================================
"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition
All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.
"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has
been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump, to the
point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."
Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the
Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct phases or
stages:
"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The
president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140 characters were
all it took to change the world."
"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's
vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of
hyperbole."
"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from
reality."
The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk
opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does. If Trump
announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would
suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to the logic of TDS.
There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be
received positively by TDSers.
The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early
2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for late-
night comics and nothing more.
Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first
coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in 2003.
The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in
otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay -
the very existence of George W. Bush."