From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Another out of control judge
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 13:07:29 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-11-20 10:04, NoBody wrote:
> The Maine Supreme Judicial Court is weighing whether a lower court
> overstepped constitutional limits when it barred a mother from taking
> her 12-year-old daughter to church services and restricted her from
> exposing the child to Bible teachings.
>
> The case, Bickford v. Bradeen, has drawn attention for its unusual
> scope and the broader questions it raises about parental rights,
> judicial neutrality toward religion and the evidentiary standards used
> in family-law disputes.
> Why It Matters
>
> At the center of the case is an unusually sweeping custody order that
> barred a Maine mother from taking her 12-year-old daughter to church
> or exposing her to Bible teachingsârestrictions the mother argues
> violate her constitutional rights and exceed the authority of family
> courts.
>
> The stateâs high court must now determine whether judges can curtail a
> fit parentâs religious practices based on findings of potential
> psychological harm, a question that could reshape how courts
> nationwide weigh parental rights, religious freedom and expert
> testimony in custody disputes.
>
> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/mom-battles-judge-s-order-banning-her-taking-daughter-to-church/ar-AA1QB83j
>
> Outrageous.
Did you read the entire article?
Do you even care about the details?