Davin News Server

On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 13:13:32 -0000 (UTC),  Mort Davis says...  

> Trump likes sucking his cock so we must all do so as well.

Only a faggot, like you, would think of gay sex acts.

I guess faggot forgot his past of worshiping communism and socialism, which 
meant you prayed at the alter of The soviet Union and Russia.

=====

Why It's Hard To Take Democrats Seriously On Russia

Since When Do Democrats Hate Russia?

The mainstream media continues it's old, tiresome hysteria. This time it is 
over President Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The left 
has jumped all over Trump because he said that Putin strongly denied meddling 
in our election, and he believed him.

According to the media, that was capitulating. All of the major liberal news 
networks began attacking Trump. They had panels of "pundits" who said this was 
treason, then began to yell even louder for impeachment.

Since the day Trump was elected, Russia has been the reason they lost, 
according to the left. However, there is a strange dichotomy. Over the years, 
the left has loved Russia.

DEMOCRATS HAVE ALWAYS HAD A LOVE AFFAIR WITH THE RUSSIANS:

In truth, they love the communist and socialist philosophy that has been used 
to control the citizens and liberate the government. The goal of liberals is 
to be more like Russia, which makes it strange why they hate the former Soviet 
Union so much now. 

During the height of the Cold War with the Soviets, a sitting United States 
senator, liberal Democrat Teddy Kennedy, wrote a letter to Soviet General Yuri 
Andropov stating he was eager to "counter the militaristic policies" of 
President Reagan in an attempt to thwart the president's reelection bid. 
Kennedy was the one who was colluding. 

For years, the Clintons have been taking money from Russia. Usually, the price 
for a speech was at least $250,000. What does Bill or Hillary have to talk 
about that would warrant taking that much for speaking for only about 30-45 
minutes? It is ironic Hillary claims that Trump is Putin's puppet, considering 
she has no problem taking money from shady Russian sources. 

Let's mention something else about Hillary. An FBI informant stated that 
Russia paid millions of dollars to lobby so that Clinton's charities would 
receive assistance. The biggest catch is Hillary was Secretary of State when 
this occurred. Can we say pay to play? It looks like Hillary knows more about 
colluding with Russia than anyone else. Her loud barking about Moscow is a 
played straight out of the Saul Alinsky Rules for Radicals book. Accuse the 
other side of impropriety while you are doing that same thing. In truth, 
Russian money was probably used in Hillary's election campaign. 
Recommended
CNN Reporter Says the Quiet Part Out Loud About Afghans and the National Guard 
Attack in DC
Matt Vespa
Related:

In 2012, Mitt Romney was running against Obama. During the debate, Romney 
stated that Russia was America's most significant geopolitical threat. He was 
right. The government is overtly corrupt, and they are the world's second-
largest nuclear threat, which is a scary combination. Instead, Obama, in his 
typical condescending way, told Romney "the 1980's are calling, and they want 
their foreign policy back. The Cold War has been over for 20 years." Obama 
downplayed the threat of Russia. What changed? Was Obama in backroom deals 
with the Kremlin? 

It makes sense why Obama mocked Romney about Russia. An open microphone told 
us all we needed to know. During a meeting with then Russian President Dmitry 
Medvedev, Obama told the president to let "Vlad know I will have more 
flexibility after the election" on a hot mic. More flexibility for what? Only 
crooked dealings would need to wait until after the presidential election. 
More collusion?

There is example after example of Democrats getting cozy with the Kremlin. The 
Democratic Party had no problem with Russia until recently. The left cannot 
handle defeat. Now, they "hate" Russia, and are blaming them in an attempt to 
undo a just election.  

The outrage that has bombarded us the last few days is fake. The left loves 
Russia, and they love Russian money. Their temper tantrum is over Trump 
winning the election. Liberal policies get slammed by conservative ones every 
time. Trump is calling out the media for their lies. The meeting with Putin 
was going to be criticized no matter what. 

If Trump had blasted Putin, the mainstream news networks would have attacked 
Trump for trying to start a war with Russia. Instead, he did the opposite and 
was wrong. There is no winning here. Trump will always be wrong in their eyes.

However, it is quite hypocritical to see how Democrats are attacking Russia 
now when they have been bunkmates with the Kremlin for decades. 


=============================================================================

"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition

All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.

"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has 
been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump, to the 
point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."

Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the 
Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct phases or 
stages:

"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The 
president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140 characters were 
all it took to change the world."

"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's 
vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of 
hyperbole."

"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from 
reality."

The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk 
opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does. If Trump 
announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would 
suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. 
There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be 
received positively by TDSers.

The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 
2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for late-
night comics and nothing more.

Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first 
coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in 2003. 
The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in 
otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - 
the very existence of George W. Bush."