Davin News Server

On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 07:23:06 -0500,  Chris Ahlstrom says...  

> > Trump has the blood of two National Guardsmen on his hands as far as I'm 
> > concerned. He knows that and that's why he's spinning so hard...

How so?

Trump had NOTHING to do with the granting of asylum, no more than Biden had in 
hiring of Rahmanullah Lakanwal... right?

The granting of asylum in the United States is typically done by the U.S. 
government, specifically through the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 
(USCIS) or the U.S. Department of State.

In the scenario you described, if the U.S. government "hired" a foreign 
national in Afghanistan and then granted them asylum in the U.S. after the 
war, the granting of asylum would likely involve the following steps:

The U.S. government, through the Department of State or the Department of 
Defense, would identify the individual and determine that they are eligible 
for asylum.

The individual would then be referred to USCIS, which would review their 
eligibility for asylum and conduct an interview.

If the individual is deemed eligible, USCIS would then grant them asylum, 
which would involve providing them with a document, such as a Form I-94, that 
confirms their status as an asylee.

THE ACTUAL GRANTING OF ASYLUM WOULD BE DONE BY A USCIS OFFICER, who would have 
the authority to make such a determination. THIS OFFICER would review the 
individual's application, conduct an interview, and verify their identity and 
eligibility for asylum before making a decision.

It's worth noting that the process of granting asylum can be complex and 
involves various government agencies and departments. However, in general, the 
U.S. government has the authority to grant asylum to individuals who meet the 
eligibility requirements, and the USCIS IS THE AGENCY RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING 
SUCH DETERMINATIONS.

The President is not directly informed of asylum determinations and 
approvals.

=====


If the CIA hired an individual in Afghanistan, the process of hiring them as a 
"special agent" would likely involve the CIA's Directorate of Operations (DO), 
WHICH IS RESPONSIBLE for conducting human intelligence operations overseas.

The specific individual or entity responsible for hiring the agent would 
likely be:

1.) A CIA Station Chief or their deputy, who oversees CIA operations in a 
specific country (in this case, Afghanistan)

2.) A CIA Case Officer, who is responsible for recruiting, handling, and 
managing foreign nationals as agents

3.) A CIA Operations Officer, who is responsible for planning and executing 
operations, including the recruitment and management of agents

These individuals would typically work together to identify, recruit, and 
manage foreign nationals as agents, and would be responsible for making 
decisions about who to hire and how to utilize them.

In terms of specific titles, the individual responsible for hiring the agent 
might be:

A Clandestine Operations Officer (COO)
A Special Activities Officer (SAO)
A Case Officer (CO)

These individuals would work together to evaluate the agent's skills, 
experience, and potential, and to determine whether they are suitable for hire 
as a "special agent" in country.

=====
 
> Also a nice distraction from the EPSTEIN files.

Tell us, Einstein von Brainstorm Mind Reader... in what context is Trump in 
the Epstein files?
 
> >> The suspect was identified as 29-year-old Afghan national Rahmanullah 
> >> Lakanwal, who entered the country under Biden in 2021. Lakanwal?s 
> >> permission the be in the US expired in September 2025, and he has been 
> >> living in the United States illegally ever since. The alien entered 
> >> under Biden?s ?Operation Allies Welcome? program following the botched 
> >> 2021 Afghanistan withdrawal.
> 
> And he was granted asylum under Trump.

So?

And?

If Trump is guilty of "letting" him be granted asylum (he's not, because he 
has NO knowledge of granted asylees), then Biden is "guilty" of hiring him in 
the first place.

This is what you called "impeachment by implication". If Biden hadn't hired 
him...

Do you get that, liberal lying Democrat pussy faggot?

Sorry... I forgot... liberals CAN'T get smarter... liberalism eats away at 
that part of the brain.

=============================================================================

"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition

All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.

"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has 
been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump, to the 
point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."

Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the 
Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct phases or 
stages:

"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The 
president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140 characters were 
all it took to change the world."

"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's 
vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of 
hyperbole."

"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from 
reality."

The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk 
opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does. If Trump 
announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would 
suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. 
There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be 
received positively by TDSers.

The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 
2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for late-
night comics and nothing more.

Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first 
coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in 2003. 
The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in 
otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - 
the very existence of George W. Bush."