From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: How Can You Be A Murderer If You Have Murderers Klled?
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2025 14:42:26 -0600
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
No refutation noted, thank you.
=====
On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 11:51:42 -0800, Alan says...
> Fact is: you CAN be a murder if you have murders killed.
You CAN be a murder?
WHO is the "murder"?
Murders killed?
So, Andy Griffith is a murderer?
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/DqEJ0ouRJaI?feature=share
Actually... no. He missed. LOL
> Absent a conviction and a sentence of death, deliberate killing of
> someone...
Uhhh...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=sIcCDfZSfIY&pp=ygUbc29tYWxpIHBpcmF0ZXMgZ2V0dGluZyBzaG90
https://youtu.be/sHrdc7YnN0c
WHO is giving Somali pirates due process?
Hint: NO ONE.
So... what's the difference between killing pirates and drug smugglers?
What "proof" and "evidence" did the pirate killers have, that said they
weren't going to hijack the ships?
Your argument is pure TDS. (see below)
> ...even someone everyone absolutely KNOWS committed a murder...
>
> ...is murder.
Nope.
Drunk again?
It's murderER.
> And there is no proof...
> ...not even any evidence...
> ...that any of the persons the Trump administration has killed are even
> drug smugglers.
And YOU have no idea or proof they aren't.
When you can get all the paperwork that's been produced, you can list it here.
In the meantime:
PLONK!
Bonus:
The Robert Dziekanski case: In 2007, Robert Dziekanski, a Polish immigrant,
was killed by RCMP officers at Vancouver International Airport after he was
deemed to be a threat to himself and others. The incident sparked widespread
controversy and raised questions about police use of force.
No arrest?
No trial?
The Sammy Prince Benoit case: In 2016, Sammy Prince Benoit, a 22-year-old
Indigenous man, was shot and killed by a police officer in Val-d'Or, Quebec.
The incident sparked protests and raised concerns about police treatment of
Indigenous peoples.
No arrest?
No trial?
The Colten Boushie case: In 2016, Colten Boushie, a 22-year-old Indigenous
man, was shot and killed by a police officer in Prince Albert, Saskatchewan.
The incident sparked widespread outrage and raised questions about police use
of force and systemic racism.
No arrest?
No trial?
Glass houses, faggot... glass houses.
=============================================================================
"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition
All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.
"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has
been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump, to the
point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."
Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the
Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct phases or
stages:
"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The
president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140 characters were
all it took to change the world."
"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's
vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of
hyperbole."
"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from
reality."
The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk
opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does. If Trump
announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would
suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to the logic of TDS.
There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be
received positively by TDSers.
The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early
2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for late-
night comics and nothing more.
Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first
coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in 2003.
The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in
otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay -
the very existence of George W. Bush."