Davin News Server

Speaking of bitch hypocrites...

Just a TINY sample:

=====

Travel Bans: During his presidency, Donald Trump issued a travel ban targeting 
predominantly Muslim countries. SIMILARLY, in 2020, PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN ISSUED 
A TRAVEL BAN ON TRAVELERS from certain countries, citing concerns over COVID-
19 variants.

=====

Border Wall: Trump advocated for and built a border wall along the US-Mexico 
border. In 2006, President George W. Bush, a Republican, signed a bill that 
included funding for a border fence. However, Democrats at the time criticized 
the idea.

Someone forgot to tell these Democrats about Barrack Hussein Obama, Hillary 
Clinton and Joe Biden

https://youtu.be/v6denkE_Cxk

Obama FOR border security:
"The bill (border reform) before us will certainly do some good. It will 
authorize some badly needed funding for better fences and better security 
along our borders."

Obama AGAINST border security:
The fence is now basically complete. Maybe they'll need a moat. Maybe they 
want alligators in the moat.

Hillary Clinton FOR border security:
Secure our borders with technology, personnel, physical barriers if necessary 
in some places.

Hillary Clinton AGAINST border security:
We will not build a wall. Instead we will build an economy where everyone who 
wants a good job can get one.

Joe Biden FOR border security:
I voted for a fence. I voted unlike most Democrats, and some of you won't like 
it. I voted for 700 mile fence. Let me tell you something, folks. People are 
driving across that border with tons... tons, hear me... tons of everything 
from byproducts from methamphetamine to cocaine to heroin. It's all coming up 
through Mexico.

Biden AGAINST border security:
And the impulse is to hunker down, shut the gates, build walls, exit at this 
moment, is precisely the wrong answer.

Journalist:
Former presidents have said to him that they wish that they had built a wall. 
Do you recall President Obama ever saying that?

Come on. 

Chuck Schumer FOR border security:
Construction of a 630 mile border fence. Create a significant barrier to 
illegal immigration on our southern land border.

Chuck Schumer AGAINST border security:
All along, the president saying, Well, I'll do DACA and Dreamers in return for 
the wall. He's got it. President Trump, if you want to open the government, 
you must abandon the wall. 

=====

Drones for Surveillance and Strikes: Trump used drones for surveillance and 
targeted strikes. President Barack Obama, a Democrat, also used drones for 
these purposes during his presidency.

NSA Surveillance: Trump was criticized for his administration's surveillance 
practices, particularly the Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence 
Surveillance Act (FISA) renewals.

However, IT WAS UNDER PRESIDENT OBAMA that the NSA bulk collection program was 
started.

Executive Orders: Trump issued numerous executive orders. President Obama also 
issued many executive orders during his presidency.

Tariffs: Trump imposed tariffs on various countries, citing trade concerns. 
President Obama also imposed tariffs on countries.

These examples illustrate instances where actions taken by Trump were also 
taken by Democrats, but received different reactions.

=====

Here are some examples of actions taken by Democrats that they previously 
criticized Republicans for:

NSA Surveillance: Democrats, including President Obama, were criticized for 
their administration's surveillance practices, particularly the Section 702 of 
the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) renewals and the bulk 
collection program. However, in the early 2000s, many Democrats, including 
then-Senator Obama, criticized the Bush administration's surveillance 
practices.

Guantánamo Bay Detention Center: President Obama faced criticism for his 
failure to close the detention center at Guantánamo Bay, a promise he made 
during his 2008 campaign. However, in 2002, many Democrats, including then-
Senator Obama, supported the initial establishment of the detention center.

Drone Strikes: The Obama administration used drones for targeted strikes, 
which some criticized as extra-judicial killings. However, in 2010, then-
Senator Obama and other Democrats criticized the Bush administration's use of 
drone strikes.

Immigration Enforcement: The Obama administration faced criticism for its 
immigration enforcement policies, including deportations and border security. 
However, in the 1990s and early 2000s, many Democrats, including then-Senator 
Obama, supported stricter immigration enforcement.

Military Interventions: The Obama administration engaged in military 
interventions in countries such as Libya and Syria. However, in the lead-up to 
the Iraq War in 2003, many Democrats, including then-Senator Obama, criticized 
the Bush administration's plans for military intervention.

Budget and Spending: The Obama administration faced criticism for its handling 
of the federal budget and spending. However, in the 1990s and early 2000s, 
many Democrats, including then-Senator Obama, criticized Republican 
administrations for their handling of the budget and spending.

These examples illustrate instances where Democrats took actions or maintained 
policies that they previously criticized Republicans for.

=============================================================================

"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition

All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.

"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has 
been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump, to the 
point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."

Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the 
Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct phases or 
stages:

"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The 
president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140 characters were 
all it took to change the world."

"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's 
vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of 
hyperbole."

"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from 
reality."

The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk 
opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does. If Trump 
announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would 
suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. 
There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be 
received positively by TDSers.

The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 
2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for late-
night comics and nothing more.

Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first 
coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in 2003. 
The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in 
otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - 
the very existence of George W. Bush."

Added Krauthammer:

"Some clinicians consider this delusion - that Americans can only get their 
news from one part of the political spectrum - the gravest of all. They report 
that no matter how many times sufferers in padded cells are presented with 
flash cards with the symbols ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, PBS, Time, 
Newsweek, New York Times, Washington Post, L.A. Times - they remain 
unresponsive, some in a terrifying near-catatonic torpor."

(If you don't realize the idea of TDS or BDS is - in no small part - meant in 
a tongue-in-cheek manner then, well, you may well have it.)

Trump allies believe that TDS is worse than ODS or BDS - by a lot. Wrote 
conservative pundit Bernie Goldberg on Real Clear Politics in early 2017:

"Before the election, the victims of TDS routinely compared Donald Trump to 
Hitler. Guess what. They're still doing it. Articles in respectable 
publications written by professors at elite universities are warning us to be 
on guard, that a Trump presidency could imperil democracy-as-we-know-it and 
may very well spell doom for American civilization.

"On election night, as it became obvious that their worst nightmare was about 
to come true, some libs fainted. Some vomited. Many more threatened to leave 
the country, but I'm pretty sure none actually did. As Donald Trump might say 
in a tweet: so sad!"

The truth is that TDS is just the preferred nomenclature of Trump defenders 
who view those who oppose him and his policies as nothing more than the blind 
hatred of those who preach tolerance and free speech. Viewed more broadly, the 
rise of presidential derangement syndromes is a function of increased 
polarization - not to mention our national self-sorting - at work in the 
country today.

We no longer live around, work around or pal around with people who think any 
differently than us. We watch cable news that affirms what we already think. 
We read ideological "news" sites that tell us how good our side is and how bad 
the other one is. And on and on and on.

Is it any wonder then that we are increasingly willing to lump those who 
disagree with us into the "deranged" category? To say that those who don't 
share our views are mentally deficient in some way?

What does it say about a President - and about a country - when the standard 
response to those with whom you disagree is that they must be crazy? Nothing 
good, for sure. 

=====

Many clinicians, political commentators, and members of the public have 
speculated upon the mental health of President Donald Trump. Indeed, over 
70,000 people self-identifying as "mental health professionals" have signed a 
petition declaring that "Trump is mentally ill and must be removed." In 
sociological terms, the "medical gaze" has been hitherto focused on President 
Trump, and to a lesser extent his ardent supporters.

However, in recent months, many have been questioning the direction of this 
"medical gaze." In fact, more and more people are suggesting that this 
"medical gaze" should be reversed and refocused on President Trump's most 
embittered and partisan opponents. Some have even suggested that these 
opponents are experiencing a specific mental condition-a condition which has 
been labelled "Trump Derangement Syndrome" (TDS).
What does DSM-5 say about "Trump Derangement Syndrome"?

Mental illnesses are officially classified in a dense and dry book published 
by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) known as the Diagnostic and 
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). This book 
contains 947 pages and lists hundreds of mental disorders; TDS is nowhere to 
be seen. Similarly, a review of scholarly databases such as MEDLINE and Google 
Scholar reveal no academic papers on this alleged syndrome. Officially at 
least, TDS is not a real, diagnosable, or treatable mental disorder.

That said, medical anthropologists and critical sociologists have convincingly 
argued that DSM-5 is a flawed document. Indeed, social scientists have long 
recognized that there are numerous "folk categories" of mental disorders that 
are considered real conditions by the general public, even though they are not 
recognized as such in the DSM. These include categories such as "burnout" or 
"nervous breakdown."

As such, lack of official recognition does not mean that TDS is not a real 
mental condition.


Lay Understandings of "Trump Derangement Syndrome"

There is no shared lay understanding of TDS, mainly because it is a folk 
category rather than a professional category. As such, there is currently much 
armchair speculation about the nature and existence of TDS, without consensus.

The name itself explicitly suggests a "syndrome," which the Oxford English 
Dictionary defines as "a characteristic combination of opinions, emotions, or 
behavior." Several commentators have run with this, putting forth suggestions 
about opinions, emotions and behaviors characterizing TDS.

Shared amongst these is a notion that the everyday activities of President 
Trump trigger some people into distorted opinions, extreme emotions and 
hysterical behaviors. Well-known writer Bernard Goldberg gives supposed 
behavioral examples of TDS among Trump's political opponents, including 
fainting, vomiting, students retreating to "safe spaces" and others demanding 
"therapy dogs." Political commentator Justin Raimondo focuses on opinions, 
language and cognition, writing in the LA Times that "sufferers speak a 
distinctive language consisting of hyperbole [leading to] a constant state of 
hysteria... the afflicted lose touch with reality."

Such forms of highly emotional reaction could be something akin to the 
fainting and screaming characterizing American Beatlemania in the 1960s. 
Unlike the Beatles, however, the extreme emotional reaction alleged to 
characterize TDS is not based on adoration and admiration, but on fear and 
loathing.

Contrariwise, many others ridicule the notion that TDS is anything but a 
malicious slur term used to discredit and delegitimize criticism of President 
Trump. For example, CNN's Chris Cillizza may speak for many when he stated: 
"The truth is that TDS is just the preferred nomenclature of Trump defenders 
who view those who oppose him and his policies as nothing more than blind 
hatred." Likewise, Adam Gopnik writes that "our problem is not TDS; our 
problem is Deranged Trump Self-Delusion."

In other words, there are polarized opinions about the nature, reality and 
existence of TDS.


Conclusion

The wider public may be unaware that psychiatrists and social scientists spend 
considerable time and energy behind closed doors pondering over the existence 
and reality of mental conditions. This has led the APA to revise the DSM five 
times since 1952, considerably expanding the list of official mental disorders 
with each revision. As far as I am aware, few psychiatrists are currently 
arguing that DSM-6 should contain TDS as a mental disorder.

That said, in its official definition of mental disorder, the DSM-5 states 
that "a mental disorder is a syndrome characterized by clinically significant 
disturbance in an individual's cognition, emotion regulation, or behavior... 
mental disorders are usually associated with significant distress in social, 
occupational, or other important activities."

Many have argued that some people have been seriously disturbed and distressed 
by the policies, speech, behavior, and tweets of President Trump, so much so 
that it has affected their cognitive, affective, and behavioral functioning. 
Such people may need mental health support. As such, further research is 
necessary to investigate the extreme reactions toward President Trump, in the 
same way that researchers investigate other extreme social phenomena, such as 
Beatlemania or the like. This will shed light on the reality of this emerging 
folk category that has been labelled by many as "Trump Derangement Syndrome."