From: JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.atheism,sci.skeptic,alt.politics.democrats
Subject: Re: Alan "Rich Kid" Baker, Knows EVERYTHING!
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2025 14:03:49 -0500
Organization: Eek
On 12/7/25 12:43 PM, Ken wrote:
> With such a narrow focus, how can they possibly have any expertise on
> climate? They would be more knowledgeable if they forgot what they've
> allegedly learned and went back to get liberal arts degrees, like poets,
> businessmen, lawyers or politicians. We should never trust doctors or
> specialists for the same reason. Anyone who specializes in anything has no
> credibility.
It's called an "Appeal to Authority," and it's a fallacious argument.
fal·âla·âcious fÉ-ËlÄ-shÉs
Synonyms of fallacious
1
: embodying a fallacy
a fallacious conclusion
a fallacious argument
2
: tending to deceive or mislead : delusive
⦠false and fallacious hopes â¦â
Conyers Middleton
Your "Position" would not be acceptable on a high school debating
team, not actually constituting any real "Argument."
What happens is that stupid and/or dogmatic people have an emotional
need to support/defend a position, but lack the intellect to
challenge ideas presented, deconstruct arguments and verify claims
of fact. So they don't bother. Instead, they engage in a "Fallacious"
argument.
Gwobull Warbling is a hoax. And just one fact alone is enough for
the emotionally stable to see this fact: This make pretend "Climate
Science" only ever compares the Holocene to itself, and even then it
only ever compares to closely related points within the post
industrial era to themselves.
Now you don't know what I just said, much less why that excludes
AGW "Science" from actually being science, but that's what makes you
so funny.
You're hilarious!
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/