Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 12:37:20 -0700
From: trollhunter <hans@franz.not>
Newsgroups: can.politics,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.global-warming,alt.atheism,sci.skeptic,alt.politics.democrats
Subject: Re: Alan "Rich Kid" Baker, Knows EVERYTHING!
On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 18:34:58 +0000
Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
> JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote in news:10hup6d$3n0tm$1@dont-email.me:
>=20
> > On 12/17/25 11:23 AM, Paul Aubrin wrote: =20
> >> Le 10/12/2025 =C3=A0 20:12, Mitchell Holman a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: =20
> >>> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Since when do the climate change
> >>> deniers care about scientific data? =20
> >>=20
> >> Red curve : ocean temp=C3=A9ratures variations (source : hadley Center)
> >> Green curve : carbon dioxide concentration variations (source :
> >> Mauna Loa)=20
> >> https://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadsst3sh/derivative/mean:12/mean:14
> >> /=20
> >> from:1958/normalise/plot/esrl-co2/derivative/mean:12/mean:14/scale:20/
> >> detrend:3/from:1958/normalise
> >>=20
> >> At a glance, temperatures vary before carbon dioxide concentrations
> >> vary. =20
> >=20
> > Which makes perfect sense, as the warmer it is the more CO2 that is
> > given off by the ocean, the permafrost or *Anything*.
> >=20
> > Oddly, I heard this from the very beginning. Meaning, even when I
> > wasn't questioning the narrative.
> >=20
> > The hysterical climate shit stains don't know this but the rest of
> > us grew up in the same world that they did. We were exposed to all
> > the exact same media, the narrative. Nearly all of us just went
> > along with it UNTIL we were given reason to question, to examine
> > the claims... test ideas. =20
>=20
>=20
> Climate change deniers, lunar landing deniers,
> evolution deniers, anti-vaxxers, flat earthers,
> they all use the same rhetoric and thus all sound
> alike.=20
Project much, Twitchy Mitchy?