Davin News Server

In article <10khfcc$2tnfv$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> > uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ... and say this.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800,  Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Road?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they standing on?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to travel?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Sure they were.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> You don't.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts, as usual, with
> >>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and came back at the
> >>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot her again.
> >>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an "officer"...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future "attacks".
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what
> >>>>>>> could happen.
> >>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to its left
> >>>>>> with the wheels turned right.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But it went straight.
> >>>>
> >>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels turned all
> >>>> the way to the right.
> >>>
> >>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.
> >>
> >> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right move
> >> straight ahead from a stop.
> > 
> > You never drove on ice.
> 
> I've driven on ice since I learned  to drive.

Liar.
> 
> >>
> >> Basic physics, doofus.
> > 
> > Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.
> Utterly irrelevant and a lame deflection.

So you don't know basic physics.
> 
> Draw a free body diagram that shows the forces that would cause the 
> vehicle to move forward when the driven wheels are steered to the right.

Rear wheeled vehicles can do that.
> 
> To you even know what a "free body diagram" is?

You had to Google it.