Davin News Server

On 2026-01-18 08:43, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <10khfcc$2tnfv$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ... and say this.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800,  Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Road?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they standing on?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to travel?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sure they were.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You don't.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts, as usual, with
>>>>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and came back at the
>>>>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot her again.
>>>>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an "officer"...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future "attacks".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what
>>>>>>>>> could happen.
>>>>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to its left
>>>>>>>> with the wheels turned right.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But it went straight.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels turned all
>>>>>> the way to the right.
>>>>>
>>>>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.
>>>>
>>>> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right move
>>>> straight ahead from a stop.
>>>
>>> You never drove on ice.
>>
>> I've driven on ice since I learned  to drive.
> 
> Liar.

Grew up in southern Ontario. Did my first driving of the family station 
wagon while going skiing at about age 14.

>>
>>>>
>>>> Basic physics, doofus.
>>>
>>> Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.
>> Utterly irrelevant and a lame deflection.
> 
> So you don't know basic physics.

I know far MORE than basic physics, and that's why I know your mention 
of "absolute zero" is a deflection.

>>
>> Draw a free body diagram that shows the forces that would cause the
>> vehicle to move forward when the driven wheels are steered to the right.
> 
> Rear wheeled vehicles can do that.

You mean "rear wheel DRIVE vehicles" and this wasn't that.

>>
>> To you even know what a "free body diagram" is?
> 
> You had to Google it.
How would I have even KNOWN to Google that term? Every accusation an 
admission.

Actually, I learned in high school physics; admittedly a class 
equivalent to AP physics.

:-)