Davin News Server

On 2026-01-18 08:42, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <10khf9o$2tnfv$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ... and say this.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800,  Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Road?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they standing on?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to travel?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sure they were.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You don't.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts, as usual, with
>>>>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and came back at the
>>>>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot her again.
>>>>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an "officer"...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future "attacks".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what
>>>>>>>>> could happen.
>>>>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to its left
>>>>>>>> with the wheels turned right.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But it went straight.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels turned all
>>>>>> the way to the right.
>>>>>
>>>>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.
>>>>
>>>> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right move
>>>> straight ahead from a stop.
>>>
>>> You never drove on ice.
>>>>
>>>> Basic physics, doofus.
>>>
>>> Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And regardless, it shows her intent.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which was to make a U Turn on a one way street and ICE
>>>>>>> just happened to be there. Yea that will sell a jury.
>>>>>> I suspect the reason she wanted to turn around was that ICE was present
>>>>>> and she wanted to get out of there.
>>>>>
>>>>> She was there because she knew who they were. That is
>>>>> settled.
>>>>
>>>> By what source?
>>>
>>> By the fact they had uniforms and shit. You really are
>>> this stupid.
>>
>> That answers the "who they were" part...
> 
> They knew.
>>
>> ...but not the "she was there BECAUSE" part.
> 
> It will in court.
>>
>>>>
>>>>> Why didn't she just keep going?
>>>> The street was being occupied by ICE agents.
>>>
>>> Nope, she could have gone on. She knew the agents were
>>> there so why did she go anyway?
>> Yup. The videos show the many ICE vehicles there.
> 
> But yo said she didn't know who they were.
> 
> 

No. In one post, I called the ICE agent "the man" as a generic term.