From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump,can.politics
Subject: Re: Poor Little Rich Kid... So Desperate for Validation... Just Keeps
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 15:19:02 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2026-01-17 15:54, Socialism is for losers wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2026 14:03:41 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2026-01-17 00:30, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> who weaponize her car.
>>>>>>>>>> Who was just trying to leave the area.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> By stomping on the gas with a man standing in front of her car?
>>>>>>>> By turning her wheel all the way to her right and assuming that a man
>>>>>>>> who had been walking to her left would continue to walk left.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And there was no "stomping".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The car sure jerked ahead as it hit him.
>>>>>> Nope. The "officer" might have jerked, but there is video taken from
>>>>>> outside the car and it moved off in a completely ordinary manner.
>>>>>
>>>>> It jerked.
>>>>
>>>> The officer seems to have jerked in his cellphone video...
>>>>
>>>> ...but that doesn't prove that he was struck.
>>>
>>> The other videos show he was hit.
>>
>> No video shows it. Not one.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Moving himself quickly out of the way could produce such a jerk.
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And you haven't addressed that she was clearly steering away from him..
>>>>>
>>>>> Well she's a shitty driver then. Besides she was making a
>>>>> u turn on a one way street. You defended her by saying she
>>>>> didn't know it was a one way street. So not only is she a
>>>>> shitty driver she shouldn't even be driving at all.
>>>>
>>>> None of that changes that she was steering away from him.
>>>
>>> She still hit him
>>
>> That is, as yet, unproven.
>>
>>>
>>>>>> ...which she wouldn't have been doing if she was "weaponizing her car".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh you read her mind? How many time have you personally
>>>>> been in the same situation? Never? Then STFU.
>>>> If her intent was to hit him, she chose a course of action that
>>>> absolutely minimized the chance.
>> Got no answer for that part, huh?
>
> It doesn't matter. She knew he was in frront of her car and she drove
> in such a manner as to hit him.
If that were true, she wouldn't have been steering to her right.
'2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles.
Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless:
(1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person
with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is
operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical
injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable
means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path
of the vehicle.'
Read that last part until you get it:
'and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist,
which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.'