Davin News Server

In article <10kjpf4$3rq8m$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2026-01-18 08:43, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <10khfcc$2tnfv$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> > uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ... and say this.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800,  Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Road?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they standing on?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to travel?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Sure they were.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> You don't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts, as usual, with
> >>>>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and came back at the
> >>>>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot her again.
> >>>>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an "officer"...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future "attacks".
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what
> >>>>>>>>> could happen.
> >>>>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to its left
> >>>>>>>> with the wheels turned right.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> But it went straight.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels turned all
> >>>>>> the way to the right.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right move
> >>>> straight ahead from a stop.
> >>>
> >>> You never drove on ice.
> >>
> >> I've driven on ice since I learned  to drive.
> > 
> > Liar.
> 
> Grew up in southern Ontario. Did my first driving of the family station 
> wagon while going skiing at about age 14.

And I should believe that why?
> 
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> Basic physics, doofus.
> >>>
> >>> Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.
> >> Utterly irrelevant and a lame deflection.
> > 
> > So you don't know basic physics.
> 
> I know far MORE than basic physics, and that's why I know your mention 
> of "absolute zero" is a deflection.

More proof you don't know shit.
> 
> >>
> >> Draw a free body diagram that shows the forces that would cause the
> >> vehicle to move forward when the driven wheels are steered to the right.
> > 
> > Rear wheeled vehicles can do that.
> 
> You mean "rear wheel DRIVE vehicles" and this wasn't that.

How do you know?
> 
> >>
> >> To you even know what a "free body diagram" is?
> > 
> > You had to Google it.
> How would I have even KNOWN to Google that term? Every accusation an 
> admission.

For the left? Why you're right .
> 
> Actually, I learned in high school physics; admittedly a class 
> equivalent to AP physics.


You most likely flunked any class that really mattered.
> 
> :-)