Davin News Server

In article <10kjpgn$3rq8m$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2026-01-18 08:41, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <10khf80$2tnfv$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> > uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-01-17 16:06, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <10kh15n$2tajo$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2026-01-17 06:56, NoBody wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 20:17:15 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ... and say this.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800,  Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Road?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they standing on?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to travel?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Sure they were.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> You don't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts, as usual, with
> >>>>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and came back at the
> >>>>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot her again.
> >>>>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an "officer"...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future "attacks".
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what
> >>>>>>>>> could happen.
> >>>>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to its left
> >>>>>>>> with the wheels turned right.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> But it went straight.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels turned all
> >>>>>> the way to the right.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But you claim he was standing in front.  If she turned she wouldn't
> >>>>> have him with the front headlight.
> >>>>    > > You can't have things both ways dingdong.
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. We don't know that he was actually hit.
> >>>
> >>> "we" do know.
> >>
> >> Nope. That's your ideology doing your thinking for you.
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2. But if he'd been standing close enough he COULD have been hit.
> >>>
> >>> And he was.
> >>
> >> Prove it.
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> Seriously, this isn't tough to have figured out on your own, numbnuts.
> >>>
> >>> Your opinions have gone from her having no idea where she
> >>> was to she was only going home.
> >>
> >> I never said she had "no idea" where she was.
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> But neither changes the fact that her intent can be inferred from her
> >>>> actions.
> >>>
> >>> How about her wifes actions?
> >> Her wife's actions should have had no bearing on the agent's actions.
> >>
> >> Period.
> > 
> > But they do show you lied when you said they didn't know
> > who they were.
> 
> I never said that.

Yes.