From: Skeeter <invalid@none.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump,can.politics
Subject: Re: Liberal Faggot... Wrong Again
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 16:43:59 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <10kjpjj$3rq8m$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2026-01-18 04:39, AlleyCat wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:47:25 -0800, Alan says...
> >
> >>
> >> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:07:58 -0700, Skeeter says...
> >>>
> >>>>> She was a citizen attempting to turn around and depart the area.
> >>>>
> >>>> You read minds now?
> >>>
> >>> He's always thought he could read minds.
> >> I don't need to read minds.
> >>
> >> The "officer's" own cellphone video shows her turning hard to her right...
> >
> > ...and running RIGHT into him, hard.
>
> Nope. It shows the phone suddenly moving, but that proves nothing.
But but but what about the POLICIES?
>
> >
> > Her "intentions" and his actions have NOTHING to do with that FACT, faggot.
> 2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles.
> Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless:
> (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person
> with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is
> operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical
> injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable
> means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path
> of the vehicle.'
>
> Read that last part until you get it:
>
> 'and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist,
> which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.'
>
> Your own lame post mentioned this, but you didn't notice.