From: Skeeter <invalid@none.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump,can.politics
Subject: Re: Desperation Is, As Desperation Does
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 16:47:31 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <10kjprh$3rq66$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2026-01-17 15:52, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <10kh377$2tn8q$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> > uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-01-15 16:25, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <10kbu6s$15km6$22@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2026-01-15 15:43, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>> A single step to HIS right would have put him out of the path of the
> >>>>>>>> vehicle even if it went straight ahead...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ...while in FACT, it was turning to ITS right; away from him:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> <https://www.gannett-cdn.com/experiments/storytelling-embed/master/uploaded_stuff/video4-blk3.mp4>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> There is no frame of that video that shows any actual physical contact
> >>>>>>>> been Good's Honda and the agent who shot her.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> He very briefly appears to lose perfect balance, but the road is icy,
> >>>>>>>> and not so much the it prevents him from getting off three shots.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> After the Honda has gone, he doesn't reach down and grab his leg in
> >>>>>>>> pain, or anything.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Bottom line, he takes one small step to his right and there isn't even a
> >>>>>>>> possibility of contact...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ...and the Use of Force Policy states that that is what he was SUPPOSED
> >>>>>>>> to do.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Plenty of videos showing he got hit.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Nope. Not one shows any actual contact...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ...but feel free to post one immediately below this that proves I'm wrong.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Why are you ignoring the video of her "wife" running
> >>>>> around the car and taunting the agents?
> >>>>
> >>>> Explain how it is relevant to whether or not there was actually any
> >>>> contact between the car and the "agent"
> >>>
> >>> It show intent. Even a dumbass like you know that will be
> >>> important in court.
> >>
> >> It might show the wife's intent to document what was happening...
> >
> > What was happening? If all she was doing was making a u
> > turn on a one way road why all the drama?
>
> Ever heard of a "ground guide".
>
> She might have got out to make sure the driver didn't back into anything.
LOL Now I know you're trolling.
>
> >>
> >> ...but how does it justify shooting someone when you could simply have
> >> taken one step out of the way...
> >
> > You would really suck in court.
> >>
> >> ...as the agent's use of force policy required him to do?
> >
> > Fuck policy. Do you really think anything will happen?
> > He's rich now.
> '2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles.
> Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless:
> (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person
> with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is
> operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical
> injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable
> means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path
> of the vehicle.'
>
> Read that last part until you get it:
>
> 'and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist,
> which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.'
Rich.