Davin News Server

From: Skeeter <invalid@none.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump,can.politics
Subject: Re: Desperation Is, As Desperation Does
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 16:50:12 -0700
Organization: UTB

In article <10kjpsr$3rq66$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2026-01-17 15:37, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <10kh33k$2tn8q$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> > uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-01-15 16:27, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <10kbuvv$15km6$25@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2026-01-15 15:45, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <10kbr1f$15km4$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2026-01-14 22:58, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:09:09 -0800,  Alan says...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> In order to complete a three-point turn and leave the area.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Deflection.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> She was parked.
> >>>>>> If she'd been "parked" then her vehicle would have been stationary.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And not sideways in the road.
> >>>>
> >>>> The video shows her in the middle of turning around.
> >>>
> >>> Why was she turning around? She could have just drove on.
> >>
> >> Already explained to you.
> > 
> > It was a one way street and she knew that.
> 
> You don't know what she knew or when she knew it.

But you seem to. Interesting.

Anyway the cars wer all pointed in one direction for one. 
If she didn't know it was a one way street then she 
shouldn't be driving.
> 
> What I know:
> 
> '2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. 
> Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: 
> (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person 
> with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is 
> operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical 
> injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable 
> means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path 
> of the vehicle.'
> 
> Read that last part until you get it:
> 
> 'and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, 
> which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.'


Never get you through a trial. You need more.