From: Skeeter <invalid@none.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump,can.politics
Subject: Re: Liberal Faggot... Wrong Again
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 16:52:33 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <10kjq10$3rq8m$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2026-01-17 15:36, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <10kh200$2tnfv$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> > uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-01-17 00:26, Socialism is for losers wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 17:06:56 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 2026-01-16 16:43, Socialism is for losers wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 16:35:41 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 15:53, Socialism is for losers wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:43:39 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:25, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:17:39 -0800, Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I was in the Queen's York Rangers.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Uhhh... NO ONE gives a shit.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Had a lot of people trying to run you over in cars, did you?
> >>>>>>>> Nope. But she wasn't trying to run him over.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> She wouldn't have turned the wheel all the way to the right if she was.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You think you could read her mind?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The only available facts are that she hit him and he killed her.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I can read the fact that a man was walking to her left and she was
> >>>>>> steering to the right. Those are facts too.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> He was not walking when she hit him.
> >>>> That's my point: he stopped.
> >>>>
> >>>> When all the use of force policies explicitly state you shouldn't stop
> >>>> in front of a vehicle...
> >>>>
> >>>> ...he stopped.
> >>>
> >>> and she hit him.
> >>
> >> That remains unproven.
> >>
> >> But stopping was specifically called out in the use of force policies as
> >> something he SHOULD NOT DO, and also that using deadly force against a
> >> vehicle is only permissible when the agent cannot avoid being hit...
> >>
> >> ...which he could have by taking one more step.
> >>
> >> Customs and Border Patrol were called out in a 2013 report specifically
> >> for stopping in front of vehicles and then using that as a justification
> >> for shooting people.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> One more step to his right / her left and he is completely clear of any
> >>>> possible conflict.
> >>>
> >>> Had she obeyed the commands she would still be alive.
> >> There was no command to stop.
> >
> > There was and she was there for a reason. That reason got
> > her killed.
>
> So you're admitting the shot at her for the reason YOU imagine?
What?