From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump,can.politics
Subject: Re: Here We Go Again...Desperation Is, As Desperation Does - Faggot
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 15:53:48 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2026-01-18 15:52, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <10kjpuf$3rq66$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2026-01-17 15:37, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <10kh336$2tn8q$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2026-01-15 16:29, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> His: tell us of his training. Tell us what HIS training was when he was about
>>>>>>>>>>> to be run over by a domestic insurrectionist terrorist, who was blocking him
>>>>>>>>>>> and his fellow federal agents, from performing his/their duties as ICE agents.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I thought you'd never ask!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 'Chapter 1: General Guidelines
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> WHOSE "guidelines?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Customs and Border Patrol's "Use of Force Policy".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All go out the window when someone is trying to run you
>>>>>>> over.
>>>>>> No. That is exactly when the policy comes into play.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fuck the policy? You are just looking for an excuse to
>>>>> hate.
>>>> The policy exists to protect both law enforcement and citizens.
>>>>
>>>> He violated that policy to CREATE a threat.
>>>
>>> So you do admit it exists.
>>
>> Admit what: that a policy exists which he violated?
>>
>> '2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles.
>> Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless:
>> (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person
>> with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is
>> operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical
>> injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable
>> means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path
>> of the vehicle.'
>>
>> Read that last part until you get it:
>>
>> 'and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist,
>> which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.'
>
> Admit we don't do court here like you do in commie
> KKKanada. The jury will also look at the things that
> happened and the reaction and realize that he was self
> defending. Happens a lot.
Not when the see he could simply have stepped out of the way.