Davin News Server

On 2026-01-17 16:10, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <10kh0u8$2tajo$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-

>>>>> So? She wasn't the brightest bulb in the box.
>>>> How bright do you have to be to know that turning right is going to make
>>>> it less likely to his someone if that were your intent?
>>>>
>>>> Even YOU are bright enough for that...
>>>>
>>>> ...I think.
>>>
>>> We'll never know what her intent was, and it doesn't matter in the
>>> slightest...
>>>
>>> Here's the facts:
>>>
>>> 1) She knew he was in frront of her car and she drove in such a manner
>>> as to hit him.
>>
>> False. She knew he was MOVING from her right to left and she drove in a
>> manner to avoid him.
> 
> Reading minds again?

Her actions show it.

He was moving to her left, she steered to her right.

>>
>>>
>>> 2) He thought his life was in danger and he shot her.
>>
>> When all the use of force policies specifically say he cannot claim the
>> threat of a vehicle when he could have moved out of the way...
> 
> POLICIES!

Indeed. Policies he violated.

>>
>> ...which he could have.
>>
>>>
>>> 3) She had no compelling reason to drive forward.
>>
>> To exit the area.
> 
> Side ways?

To her right. Forward and to her right.

>>
>>>
>>> It also doesn't matter in the slightest what he could have done
>>> differently so as not to be in front of her car at the time. The facts
>>> that he was there and that she knew it put her in the wrong for
>>> driving forward and hitting him.
>> She had no reason to believe he'd stop, and her attention was divided at
>> that exact moment by another ICE agent grabbing at her driver's door.
> 
> So. She should have just gone forward.
If at that point, she would have "just gone forward" she would have been 
driving into the ICE agent who chose to stop in front of her.

But she CHOSE to steer to her right; the area that he was vacating until 
he stopped.