From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump,can.politics
Subject: Re: Liberal Faggot... Wrong Again
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 16:05:01 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2026-01-18 15:52, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <10kjq10$3rq8m$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2026-01-17 15:36, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <10kh200$2tnfv$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2026-01-17 00:26, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 17:06:56 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 16:43, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 16:35:41 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 15:53, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:43:39 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:25, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:17:39 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I was in the Queen's York Rangers.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Uhhh... NO ONE gives a shit.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Had a lot of people trying to run you over in cars, did you?
>>>>>>>>>> Nope. But she wasn't trying to run him over.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> She wouldn't have turned the wheel all the way to the right if she was.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You think you could read her mind?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The only available facts are that she hit him and he killed her.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can read the fact that a man was walking to her left and she was
>>>>>>>> steering to the right. Those are facts too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He was not walking when she hit him.
>>>>>> That's my point: he stopped.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When all the use of force policies explicitly state you shouldn't stop
>>>>>> in front of a vehicle...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...he stopped.
>>>>>
>>>>> and she hit him.
>>>>
>>>> That remains unproven.
>>>>
>>>> But stopping was specifically called out in the use of force policies as
>>>> something he SHOULD NOT DO, and also that using deadly force against a
>>>> vehicle is only permissible when the agent cannot avoid being hit...
>>>>
>>>> ...which he could have by taking one more step.
>>>>
>>>> Customs and Border Patrol were called out in a 2013 report specifically
>>>> for stopping in front of vehicles and then using that as a justification
>>>> for shooting people.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> One more step to his right / her left and he is completely clear of any
>>>>>> possible conflict.
>>>>>
>>>>> Had she obeyed the commands she would still be alive.
>>>> There was no command to stop.
>>>
>>> There was and she was there for a reason. That reason got
>>> her killed.
>>
>> So you're admitting the shot at her for the reason YOU imagine?
>
> What?
You said "she was there for a reason". Ergo, you imagine you know what
that reason is. Do you have a belief about that?
I'm going to spoon feed this to you because you're too dim to understand
any other way.