From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump,can.politics
Subject: Re: I Knew Alan Baker Would Be A Faggot...
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 16:12:48 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2026-01-18 16:08, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <10kjr9t$3rq66$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2026-01-18 15:41, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <10kjpf4$3rq8m$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2026-01-18 08:43, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <10khfcc$2tnfv$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and say this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Road?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they standing on?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to travel?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure they were.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts, as usual, with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and came back at the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot her again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an "officer"...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future "attacks".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what
>>>>>>>>>>>>> could happen.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to its left
>>>>>>>>>>>> with the wheels turned right.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But it went straight.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels turned all
>>>>>>>>>> the way to the right.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right move
>>>>>>>> straight ahead from a stop.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You never drove on ice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've driven on ice since I learned to drive.
>>>>>
>>>>> Liar.
>>>>
>>>> Grew up in southern Ontario. Did my first driving of the family station
>>>> wagon while going skiing at about age 14.
>>>
>>> And I should believe that why?
>>
>> I don't care whether you believe it.
>
> Translation: I lied.
>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Basic physics, doofus.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.
>>>>>> Utterly irrelevant and a lame deflection.
>>>>>
>>>>> So you don't know basic physics.
>>>>
>>>> I know far MORE than basic physics, and that's why I know your mention
>>>> of "absolute zero" is a deflection.
>>>
>>> More proof you don't know shit.
>>
>> So explain the relevance of mentioning it in this context.
>
> Just to show you talk about physics yet you don't know
> shit about it.
But it failed to show that, so...
>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Draw a free body diagram that shows the forces that would cause the
>>>>>> vehicle to move forward when the driven wheels are steered to the right.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rear wheeled vehicles can do that.
>>>>
>>>> You mean "rear wheel DRIVE vehicles" and this wasn't that.
>>>
>>> How do you know?
>>
>> I looked up what vehicle she was driving.
>>
>> You could have too.. ...if you'd been bright enough.
>
> Prove it. You really are obsessed with this shit huh?
Google "Renee good vehicle".
Read the Wikipedia article.
Done.
>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To you even know what a "free body diagram" is?
>>>>>
>>>>> You had to Google it.
>>>> How would I have even KNOWN to Google that term? Every accusation an
>>>> admission.
>>>
>>> For the left? Why you're right .
>>>>
>>>> Actually, I learned in high school physics; admittedly a class
>>>> equivalent to AP physics.
>>>
>>>
>>> You most likely flunked any class that really mattered.
>> LOL. Your every accusation is an admission.
>
> Nothing original? Got to copy us now?
Who is "us"?