From: Skeeter <invalid@none.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump,can.politics
Subject: Re: I Knew Alan Baker Would Be A Faggot...
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 17:26:07 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <10kjrbp$3rq66$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2026-01-18 15:42, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <10kjpg8$3rq8m$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> > uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-01-18 08:42, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <10khf9o$2tnfv$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and say this.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800, Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Road?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they standing on?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to travel?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure they were.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts, as usual, with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and came back at the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot her again.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an "officer"...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future "attacks".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what
> >>>>>>>>>>> could happen.
> >>>>>>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to its left
> >>>>>>>>>> with the wheels turned right.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> But it went straight.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels turned all
> >>>>>>>> the way to the right.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right move
> >>>>>> straight ahead from a stop.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You never drove on ice.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Basic physics, doofus.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> And regardless, it shows her intent.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Which was to make a U Turn on a one way street and ICE
> >>>>>>>>> just happened to be there. Yea that will sell a jury.
> >>>>>>>> I suspect the reason she wanted to turn around was that ICE was present
> >>>>>>>> and she wanted to get out of there.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> She was there because she knew who they were. That is
> >>>>>>> settled.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> By what source?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> By the fact they had uniforms and shit. You really are
> >>>>> this stupid.
> >>>>
> >>>> That answers the "who they were" part...
> >>>
> >>> They knew.
> >>>>
> >>>> ...but not the "she was there BECAUSE" part.
> >>>
> >>> It will in court.
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Why didn't she just keep going?
> >>>>>> The street was being occupied by ICE agents.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Nope, she could have gone on. She knew the agents were
> >>>>> there so why did she go anyway?
> >>>> Yup. The videos show the many ICE vehicles there.
> >>>
> >>> But yo said she didn't know who they were.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> No. In one post, I called the ICE agent "the man" as a generic term.
> >
> > No in many posts you suggested that she was lost or didn't
> > know where she was. You also claimed that she didn't know
> > they were ICE.
>
> Nope. I never suggested she was lost.
You did.
>
> I never suggested she didn't know the person in front of her was ice.