Davin News Server

In article <10kjrpd$3rq66$16@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2026-01-18 15:50, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <10kjpsr$3rq66$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> > uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-01-17 15:37, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <10kh33k$2tn8q$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2026-01-15 16:27, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <10kbuvv$15km6$25@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2026-01-15 15:45, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <10kbr1f$15km4$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-14 22:58, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:09:09 -0800,  Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> In order to complete a three-point turn and leave the area.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Deflection.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> She was parked.
> >>>>>>>> If she'd been "parked" then her vehicle would have been stationary.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> And not sideways in the road.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The video shows her in the middle of turning around.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Why was she turning around? She could have just drove on.
> >>>>
> >>>> Already explained to you.
> >>>
> >>> It was a one way street and she knew that.
> >>
> >> You don't know what she knew or when she knew it.
> > 
> > But you seem to. Interesting.
> 
> Nope. I've only pointed out what she DID>

You want us to think that you know what she and he were 
thinking.
> 
> > 
> > Anyway the cars wer all pointed in one direction for one.
> > If she didn't know it was a one way street then she
> > shouldn't be driving.
> 
> People make mistakes when they're stressed.

What was she stressed about?
> 
> That's hardly a reason to take away a driver's license.

Welcome to America.
> 
> >>
> >> What I know:
> >>
> >> '2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles.
> >> Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless:
> >> (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person
> >> with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is
> >> operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical
> >> injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable
> >> means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path
> >> of the vehicle.'
> >>
> >> Read that last part until you get it:
> >>
> >> 'and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist,
> >> which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.'
> > 
> > 
> > Never get you through a trial. You need more.
> 
> Trial of whom?

You know the left is going to bury Ross. There will be a 
trial and your "policies" bullshit will be a weak defense.
> 
> Ross MANUFACTURED a situation where he could draw his weapon.

So you could read his mind?
> 
> The policy explicitly states that you can't fire on a vehicle to prevent 
> it from fleeing.

POLICIES!!!!!