From: Skeeter <invalid@none.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump,can.politics
Subject: Re: I Knew Alan Baker Would Be A Faggot...
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 17:48:33 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <10kjsu0$3rq66$33@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2026-01-18 16:08, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <10kjr9t$3rq66$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> > uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-01-18 15:41, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <10kjpf4$3rq8m$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2026-01-18 08:43, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <10khfcc$2tnfv$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and say this.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800, Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Road?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they standing on?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to travel?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure they were.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts, as usual, with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and came back at the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot her again.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an "officer"...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future "attacks".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> could happen.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to its left
> >>>>>>>>>>>> with the wheels turned right.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> But it went straight.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels turned all
> >>>>>>>>>> the way to the right.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right move
> >>>>>>>> straight ahead from a stop.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You never drove on ice.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I've driven on ice since I learned to drive.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Liar.
> >>>>
> >>>> Grew up in southern Ontario. Did my first driving of the family station
> >>>> wagon while going skiing at about age 14.
> >>>
> >>> And I should believe that why?
> >>
> >> I don't care whether you believe it.
> >
> > Translation: I lied.
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Basic physics, doofus.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.
> >>>>>> Utterly irrelevant and a lame deflection.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So you don't know basic physics.
> >>>>
> >>>> I know far MORE than basic physics, and that's why I know your mention
> >>>> of "absolute zero" is a deflection.
> >>>
> >>> More proof you don't know shit.
> >>
> >> So explain the relevance of mentioning it in this context.
> >
> > Just to show you talk about physics yet you don't know
> > shit about it.
>
> But it failed to show that, so...
That you don't know shit about it? I agree.
>
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Draw a free body diagram that shows the forces that would cause the
> >>>>>> vehicle to move forward when the driven wheels are steered to the right.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Rear wheeled vehicles can do that.
> >>>>
> >>>> You mean "rear wheel DRIVE vehicles" and this wasn't that.
> >>>
> >>> How do you know?
> >>
> >> I looked up what vehicle she was driving.
> >>
> >> You could have too.. ...if you'd been bright enough.
> >
> > Prove it. You really are obsessed with this shit huh?
>
> Google "Renee good vehicle".
>
> Read the Wikipedia article.
>
> Done.
Wikipedia = LOL
>
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> To you even know what a "free body diagram" is?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You had to Google it.
> >>>> How would I have even KNOWN to Google that term? Every accusation an
> >>>> admission.
> >>>
> >>> For the left? Why you're right .
> >>>>
> >>>> Actually, I learned in high school physics; admittedly a class
> >>>> equivalent to AP physics.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> You most likely flunked any class that really mattered.
> >> LOL. Your every accusation is an admission.
> >
> > Nothing original? Got to copy us now?
> Who is "us"?
Answer the question.