From: Skeeter <invalid@none.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump,can.politics
Subject: Re: Desperation Is, As Desperation Does
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 17:49:03 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <10kjsq7$3rq66$31@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2026-01-18 16:04, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <10kjrtg$3rq66$19@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> > uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-01-17 16:04, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <10kh2io$2tn8q$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2026-01-16 20:31, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <10kf2eh$28hf2$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <10kerg2$268b0$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:03, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <10keh5c$23gue$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 14:25, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10ke30v$1ui33$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 04:30, NoBody wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Authorized Officers/Agents should avoid intentionally and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unreasonably placing themselves in positions in which they have no
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative to using deadly force.'
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He did. SHE changed that equation.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> He chose to remain there when a single step to his right would have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken him out of the danger area.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Laughter!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I love how you pretend to be an armchair expert on what could or could
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> not have been done. She weaponized her vehicle and he perceived a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> threat to his life and safety. Legit shoot.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> If she'd intended to drive into him, she wouldn't have been turning her
> >>>>>>>>>>>> steering wheel hard to the right...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ...and therefore AWAY from him.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> She saw a man moving across from her right to left, and how was she to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> know he'd stop moving?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> She knew exactly who he was. Stop playing stupid. Idiots
> >>>>>>>>>>> like you trying to say "she had no idea who he was" yet he
> >>>>>>>>>>> was wearing a uniform and her bitch wife was running
> >>>>>>>>>>> around taunting them So that lie is debunked.
> >>>>>>>>>> The point you missed was that he was MOVING, and if he KEPT moving, he
> >>>>>>>>>> would have been out of the way.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I was using "man" in the generic sense, not to suggest she didn't know
> >>>>>>>>>> he was with ICE.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Oh she knew.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I know that.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I was never trying to deny it.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You tried and failed. He was wearing an ICE uniform fer
> >>>>>>> crissakes.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> My POINT at the time was that the driver saw SOMEONE moving to her left
> >>>>>> when she was intending to go right. It doesn't matter WHO that someone was.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It dod to her.
> >>>>
> >>>> Nope. Not regarding the question of her intent.
> >>>
> >>> Her intent was to agitate ICE agents.
> >>
> >> Even if that were true, it's no justification for shooting her or even
> >> arresting her.
> >
> > That intent will be important in court. You just don't get
> > it do you?
>
> What was his intent in stopping when he'd been moving out of the way?
Out of the way of what?