Davin News Server

In article <10kjsfd$3rq66$25@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2026-01-18 15:52, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <10kjq10$3rq8m$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> > uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-01-17 15:36, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <10kh200$2tnfv$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2026-01-17 00:26, Socialism is for losers wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 17:06:56 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 16:43, Socialism is for losers wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 16:35:41 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 15:53, Socialism is for losers wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:43:39 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:25, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:17:39 -0800,  Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I was in the Queen's York Rangers.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Uhhh... NO ONE gives a shit.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Had a lot of people trying to run you over in cars, did you?
> >>>>>>>>>> Nope. But she wasn't trying to run him over.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> She wouldn't have turned the wheel all the way to the right if she was.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> You think you could read her mind?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The only available facts are that she hit him and he killed her.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I can read the fact that a man was walking to her left and she was
> >>>>>>>> steering to the right. Those are facts too.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> He was not walking when she hit him.
> >>>>>> That's my point: he stopped.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> When all the use of force policies explicitly state you shouldn't stop
> >>>>>> in front of a vehicle...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ...he stopped.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> and she hit him.
> >>>>
> >>>> That remains unproven.
> >>>>
> >>>> But stopping was specifically called out in the use of force policies as
> >>>> something he SHOULD NOT DO, and also that using deadly force against a
> >>>> vehicle is only permissible when the agent cannot avoid being hit...
> >>>>
> >>>> ...which he could have by taking one more step.
> >>>>
> >>>> Customs and Border Patrol were called out in a 2013 report specifically
> >>>> for stopping in front of vehicles and then using that as a justification
> >>>> for shooting people.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> One more step to his right / her left and he is completely clear of any
> >>>>>> possible conflict.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Had she obeyed the commands she would still be alive.
> >>>> There was no command to stop.
> >>>
> >>> There was and she was there for a reason. That reason got
> >>> her killed.
> >>
> >> So you're admitting the shot at her for the reason YOU imagine?
> > 
> > What?
> 
> You said "she was there for a reason". Ergo, you imagine you know what 
> that reason is. Do you have a belief about that?

She was there to incite. Proof of that is her wife acting 
like a banshee.
> 
> I'm going to spoon feed this to you because you're too dim to understand 
> any other way.


Keep your spoon cupcake. I don't eat shit. And that's all 
you have to offer.