Davin News Server

In article <10kjsj9$3rq66$27@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2026-01-18 15:55, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <10kjqbu$3rq8m$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> > uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-01-16 20:54, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <10kf27n$28hf2$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2026-01-16 20:10, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <10kerfe$268b0$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:03, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <10keh09$23gue$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 15:12, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <10ke2rs$1ui33$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:25, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:22:51 -0800,  Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-14 22:52, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Tmcvpwi.mp4
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:34:18 -0800,  Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The "escaping vehicle" posed NO THREAT AT ALL.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> YOU do not know that for a fact, faggot. So... you knew that the roads were
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> clear all the way to where Good would have gone?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> That's the standard?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Did I say that?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Yes. That's exactly what you said.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> You suggest that it is OK to shoot someone because they might encounter
> >>>>>>>>>> someone on the road at some point in the future.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> No he didn't. You spun it around to sound like that.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Ummmm...nope!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> "you knew that the roads were clear all the way to where Good would have
> >>>>>>>> gone?"
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> That is Loser explicitly claiming that shooting her was justified by the
> >>>>>>>> mere possibility that she'd encounter someone else on the road and just
> >>>>>>>> randomly decide to run them down.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You sure can turn a mole hill into a mountain.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Why was she making a U Turn/3 point turn on a one way
> >>>>>>>>> street?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Because she initially thought it wasn't a one way street.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> As she was driving down a "one way street"?  The street
> >>>>>>> had a lot of cars. Why would she decide to turn around and
> >>>>>>> it just by coincidence that there were ICE agents right
> >>>>>>> there doing their job when her wife started running and
> >>>>>>> taunting ICE. But you losers claim she didn't know who he
> >>>>>>> was. Are you that stupid?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Why didn't you address the fact that you first claimed it
> >>>>>>>>> was a U Turn and now call it a 3 point turn? Maybe you
> >>>>>>>>> should give yourself a break. You seem confused.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Please. "U-turn" can generically mean to turn around on a road.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On a one way street? Was it a U Turn or a 3 point turn?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Yes.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I know this will come as a surprise to you, but people can make mistakes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It had lots of cars all going the same direction.
> >>>>
> >>>> True. So?
> >>>
> >>> So why was she trying to turn around? I just shot your
> >>> bullshit story all to hell with your help.
> >>>>
> >>>>> She knew
> >>>>> where she was.
> >>>>
> >>>> How do you know that?
> >>>
> >>> Ask her wife. Now tell me how you knew what she was doing
> >>> and thinking.
> >>>>
> >>>>> If she didn't she shouldn't be driving and
> >>>>> that makes her a danger to herself and others.
> >>>>
> >>>> You think that otherwise completely competent drivers never find
> >>>> themselves on streets that they're not familiar with?
> >>>
> >>> But you said she dropped her kid off at school and was
> >>> heading home. So she knew where she was. You really suck
> >>> at this. You keep shooting yourself in the foot.
> >>>
> > In court theis is Alan:
> >>
> >> All of that is irrelevant in light of this:
> >>
> >> '2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles.
> >> Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless:
> >> (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person
> >> with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is
> >> operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical
> >> injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable
> >> means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path
> >> of the vehicle.'
> >>
> >> Read that last part until you get it:
> >>
> >> 'and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist,
> >> which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.'
> >>
> >> He had an "objectively reasonable means of defense":
> >>
> >> Taking one more step to his right.
> > 
> > 
> > The jusr and judge: Not guilty.
> 
> He had a reasonable means of avoiding a threat even if one had been 
> intended. All he had to do was not stop walking where he did.

Still not guilty. and rich.