Subject: Re: New York "trials" and election interference
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
From: pyotr filipivich <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com>
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:56:56 -0700
On 4/16/2024 9:08 AM, Alan wrote:
> On 2024-04-16 05:23, NoBody wrote:
>> Why is it necessary to have the trials just this moment during the
>> election cycle? No one has come up with a reasonable explanation.
>
> Trump's the one who has been delaying and delaying.
Exactly. This is *classic* Kremlin Girl crying and whinging. If the indictments
had come any earlier, she would have been shrieking about "rush to judgment" and
how it "proves" that the cases are "only political." So they come following
detailed investigation and due diligence by the prosecution, *Trump* delays them
for months and months, and now Kremlin Girl is howling that they constitute
"election interference." They are all fucking hypocrites.
>
>>
>> "Jury selection in former President Donald Trump's historic criminal
>> trial in New York will continue for a second "day on Tuesday, when the
>> process of seating potential jurors resumes as the defendant looks on.
>>
>> The first batch of jurors were sworn in on Monday after pretrial
>> arguments over evidence and rules for the proceedings. Roughly two
>> thirds of the group of 96 New Yorkers were quickly dismissed, with
>> most of them saying they wouldn't be able to be fair and impartial in
>> the trial. Others were excused for various other reasons, including
>> their answers to a list of questions posed to each juror."
>>
>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/trump-trial-set-to-continue-with-second-day-of-jury-selection-in-new-york/ar-BB1lI1lj
>>
>> A fair trial in New York? Not possible especially with the judges and
>> prosecutors engaging in election interference.
>
> An assertion without any foundation.
Spot-on correct.