Davin News Server

On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 12:52:42 -0700
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

> On 2024-04-17 11:40, Lil-man-ball wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:23:26 -0700
> > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> >  =20
> >> On 2024-04-17 11:03, Lil-man-ball wrote: =20
> >>> On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:59:24 -0700 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> >>>     =20
> >>>> On 2024-04-17 09:13, Lil-man-ball wrote: =20
> >>>>> On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:28:59 -0400 JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>     =20
> >>>>>> EVs suck. Lithium is a crisis. For real. =20
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There are other far more promising and less toxic batter
> >>>>> technologies being suppressed, so...
> >>>>>     =20
> >>>>
> >>>> Ah, the classic conspiracy nutcase argument:
> >>>>
> >>>> "There are secrets being kept from us...
> >>>>
> >>>> ...but somehow I know all about them!" =20
> >>>
> >>> Are you devoid of all knowledge but the Goo Goo brand? =20
> >>
> >> LOL
> >>
> >> This is your new thing, lil-ball-man?
> >> =20
> >>>
> >>> https://newatlas.com/tag/batteries/
> >>>
> >>> https://newatlas.com/energy/iron-air-grid-battery/
> >>>
> >>> The advantages of an iron-air battery are simple and clear. Direct
> >>> reduced iron is the cheapest form of iron available, and was
> >>> previously mainly used in steelmaking. It's extremely abundant,
> >>> and totally safe. So are water and air, the other two main
> >>> ingredients.
> >>>
> >>> https://newatlas.com/technology/simple-tweak-creates-safer-more-effic=
ient-solid-state-batteries/
> >>>
> >>>   Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) has come up with a small
> >>> tweak that could have big consequences. By making a small change
> >>> to how a type of solid-state battery is made, the scientists
> >>> managed to eliminate defects in the electrolyte film, opening the
> >>> way to safer and more efficient batteries.
> >>>
> >>> Solid-state batteries have a lot of promise. Unlike current
> >>> lithium-ion batteries, solid-state ones don't contain flammable
> >>> liquids, which are a major drawback as illustrated by stories of
> >>> laptops and electric cars bursting into flames. Solid-state
> >>> batteries are also less toxic, have higher energy densities,
> >>> charge faster, and survive more recharge cycles without
> >>> degenerating.
> >>>
> >>> https://newatlas.com/energy/form-energy-iron-battery-plant/
> >>>
> >>> Form's grid-scale batteries are built around huge flat iron-air
> >>> cells, about a meter (3.3 ft) square, around 50 of which are
> >>> slotted into modules the size of a washing machine and bathed in
> >>> a liquid electrolyte. These cells effectively work using the rust
> >>> cycle; you charge them up by applying energy to iron oxide,
> >>> turning it back into metallic iron, then add oxygen to initiate
> >>> the rust process and release energy.
> >>>
> >>> Iron is cheap and abundant, making these modules extremely
> >>> affordable. They last a long time, they're safe and they're
> >>> recyclable; if you tear down a battery you can take the metal out
> >>> and use it elsewhere. These factors all combine to make them an
> >>> exceptionally affordable form of energy storage, with a Levelized
> >>> Cost of Storage (LCoS) more than 10 times lower than lithium
> >>> batteries, even before you take the expected lithium resource
> >>> squeeze into account.
> >>>
> >>> They won't charge or discharge as quickly as lithium, of course,
> >>> so they'll likely work alongside lithium grid batteries in hybrid
> >>> configurations, the iron-air batteries dealing with longer, slower
> >>> load demands while the lithium packs handle momentary spikes. Form
> >>> says that at scale, they'll deliver more than 3 MW of output
> >>> capacity per acre, and they'll excel where energy needs to be
> >>> stored for around 100 hours or more. =20
> >>
> >>
> >> So completely NOT suppressed. =20
> >=20
> > So completely NOT available to us today, yep - suppressed. =20
>=20
> And were lithium batteries being "suppressed" back when people were=20
> talking about the technology but they weren't widely available?
=20
Yes, they certainly were!

Get this through your THICK cunt-head - ALL technology the goobermint
has is easily 100 years past what we get.

https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/391849

A landmark expose firmly grounded in fact, The Day After Roswell ends
the decades-old controversy surrounding the mysterious crash of an
unidentified aircraft at Roswell, New Mexico, in 1947. Backed by
documents newly declassified through the Freedom of Information Act,
Colonel Philip J. Corso (Ret.), a member of President Eisenhower's
National Security Council and former head of the Foreign Technology
Desk at the U.S. Army's Research & Development department, has come
forward to reveal his personal stewardship of alien artifacts from the
Roswell crash. He tells us how he spearheaded the Army's
reverse-engineering project that led to today's: Integrated circuit
chips Fiber optics Lasers Super-tenacity fibers and "seeded" the
Roswell alien technology to giants of American industry. Laying bare
the U.S. government's shocking role in the Roswell incident -- what was
found, the cover-up, and how they used alien artifacts to change the
course of twentieth-century history -- The Day After Roswell is an
extraordinary memoir that not only forces us to reconsider the past,
but also our role in the universe.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9590727/Ex-Navy-officer-says-UFO-t=
echnology-100-1-000-years-ahead-United-States.html
Two retired Navy officers warn that infamous UFO Tic-Tac sighting
indicates 'technology that outstrips our arsenal by at least 100 to
1,000 years'

'First of all the aircraft had zero control surfaces, it had no means of pr=
opulsion that we could detect, it moved at hyper-sonic velocities and it pr=
eceded the pilots to their cap point, so it seemed to have some knowledge o=
f where the pilots were headed ahead of time.

'We don't possess those abilities to do that in our arsenals at the
moment.'


https://apnews.com/article/ufos-uaps-congress-whistleblower-spy-aliens-ba8a=
8cfba353d7b9de29c3d906a69ba7

WASHINGTON (AP) =E2=80=94 The U.S. is concealing a longstanding program tha=
t retrieves and reverse engineers unidentified flying objects, a former Air=
 Force intelligence officer testified Wednesday to Congress. The Pentagon h=
as denied his claims.

Retired Maj. David Grusch=E2=80=99s highly anticipated testimony before a H=
ouse Oversight subcommittee was Congress=E2=80=99 latest foray into the wor=
ld of UAPs =E2=80=94 or =E2=80=9Cunidentified aerial phenomena,=E2=80=9D wh=
ich is the official term the U.S. government uses instead of UFOs. While th=
e study of mysterious aircraft or objects often evokes talk of aliens and =
=E2=80=9Clittle green men,=E2=80=9D Democrats and Republicans in recent yea=
rs have pushed for more research as a national security matter due to conce=
rns that sightings observed by pilots may be tied to U.S. adversaries.

Grusch said he was asked in 2019 by the head of a government task force on =
UAPs to identify all highly classified programs relating to the task force=
=E2=80=99s mission. At the time, Grusch was detailed to the National Reconn=
aissance Office, the agency that operates U.S. spy satellites.

=E2=80=9CI was informed in the course of my official duties of a multi-deca=
de
UAP crash retrieval and reverse engineering program to which I was
denied access,=E2=80=9D he said.