Davin News Server

On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 16:08:40 -0500,  Unum says...  

> https://science.nasa.gov/climate-change/faq/is-the-sun-causing-global-warming/

NASA continues to manipulate data. They lie to keep their forever jobs. If you 
tell people that there's a problem and you can solve it... you have a forever 
job.

Plus, they're saying ANYTHING the government WANTS them to say, and Biden's 
government is trying to take billions, if not trillions of dollars off its 
citizenry and distributing it to their cronies who have started up "green" 
companies, most of which will fail (some already have), but make the investors 
MILLIONS before going bankrupt.

NONE of the investors and owners of these companies went broke. They padded 
their nest eggs and declared bankruptcy, NEVER having to pay back the 
TAXPAYER'S money.

1.	Evergreen Solar ($25 million)*
2.	SpectraWatt ($500,000)*
3.	Solyndra ($535 million)*
4.	Beacon Power ($43 million)*
5.	Nevada Geothermal ($98.5 million)
6.	SunPower ($1.2 billion)
7.	First Solar ($1.46 billion)
8.	Babcock and Brown ($178 million)
9.	EnerDel's subsidiary Ener1 ($118.5 million)*
10.	Amonix ($5.9 million)
11.	Fisker Automotive ($529 million)
12.	Abound Solar ($400 million)*
13.	A123 Systems ($279 million)*
14.	Willard and Kelsey Solar Group ($700,981)*
15.	Johnson Controls ($299 million)
16.	Brightsource ($1.6 billion)
17.	ECOtality ($126.2 million)
18.	Raser Technologies ($33 million)*
19.	Energy Conversion Devices ($13.3 million)*
20.	Mountain Plaza, Inc. ($2 million)*
21.	Olsen's Crop Service and Mills Acquisition Company ($10m)*
22.	Range Fuels ($80 million)*
23.	Thompson River Power ($6.5 million)*
24.	Stirling Energy Systems ($7 million)*
25.	Azure Dynamics ($5.4 million)*
26.	GreenVolts ($500,000)
27.	Vestas ($50 million)
28.	LG Chem's subsidiary Compact Power ($151 million)
29.	Nordic Windpower ($16 million)*
30.	Navistar ($39 million)
31.	Satcon ($3 million)*
32.	Konarka Technologies Inc. ($20 million)*
33.	Mascoma Corp. ($100 million)

*Denotes companies that have filed for bankruptcy.

=====

NASA had the 97% quote on their website for the longest time. (I) don't believe 
a word (they say) (or anyone else) that says they support that lie. - Lurgid

NASA is bent with all the faking of the temperature records, plus they've just 
admitted they lost the skills they gained with the moonshot - they're so dumb, 
the director said the far side of the moon's in constant darkness. - Trinci

NASA are misleading people on purpose. The lemmings are being led into the 
ravine. - Parsignal

I love this. Remember, the people that want to control information are 1000x 
more dangerous than climate change. - Dr. Matthews

The consensus for man-made climate change is a myth. Plus there are no Nobel 
Prize winners (in the sciences) that believe that nonsense. - Shewchuck

Richard Lindzen in the new book "Climate and Energy: The Case for Realism": 
"Any intelligent reader must already appreciate that when a field of immense 
complexity like 'climate' is presented as 'settled,' the reader is being 
gaslit." 

NASA's lie: https://i.imgur.com/r9KNOZp.png

I updated that graph with current TSI data. The fact that NASA still has this 
on their website is down right fraudulent. - True Science PEng, DFP, ADFS, MA, 
MBA.

Reality:    https://i.imgur.com/Um41aVq.png

============================================================================

NEVER trust the NOAA or NASA

Where there's smoke, there's usually fire. If so many "fact checkers" JUMP at 
the chance to defend NASA of the NOAA, there's a fire.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=nasa+still+manipulating+data&ia=web

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=nasa+faking+data&ia=web

If you have to defend NASA and The NOAA THAT much... there's something afoot.

John Bates, a climate scientist who recently retired from the National Oceanic 
and Atmospheric Administration, accused his former colleagues of "flagrant 
manipulation of scientific integrity guidelines."