From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Joe Biden normalizes mental illness via executive order
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 07:37:29 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 08:57:22 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
>On 4/22/2024 5:43 PM, NoBody wrote:
>>
>> "
>>
>> Arguing the Biden administrations decision to include gender identity
>> in Title IX will harm women, conservative groups have vowed to work to
>> reverse the administrative fiat in the courts.
>>
>> Many argue Bidens Education Department lacks the authority to rewrite
>> the 52-year-old federal law to redefine sex to include sexual
>> orientation and gender identity.
>>
>> This regulation is an assault on women and girls, stated Betsy
>> DeVos, education secretary under President Donald Trump, in a post on
>> X.
>>
>> It makes it a federal requirement that boys be allowed in girls
>> bathrooms in elementary schools. It makes it a federal requirement
>> that men be allowed to play womens sports, putting their safety,
>> privacy and competitive opportunity at risk. And it makes it a federal
>> requirement that feelings, not facts, dictate how Title IX is
>> enforced, DeVos stated."
>>
>> https://www.thecollegefix.com/conservatives-prep-lawsuits-as-bidens-title-ix-rewrite-to-include-gender-identity-condemned/
>
>Title VII of the Civil Rights Act was interpreted by SCOTUS (in an
>opinion written by Gorsuch) to mean that discrimination on the basis of
>sexual orientation or gender identity in the workplace discriminates on
>the basis of sex. This interpretation of Title IX mirrors that logic.
>For example, you can't deny admission to a school because someone is gay
>or trans. Prior to this regulation, you could under federal law.
>
>Also, this regulation does not imply that boys must be allowed to use
>the girls' bathroom or men must be allowed to compete in women's sports.
>Prior to this regulation, neither was permitted even though both treat
>boys/men differently than girls/women. Privacy, safety and the integrity
>of women's sports justified treating the sexes differently. It may also
>be the case under the new regulation that denying trans women access to
>the woman's bathroom or women's sports are also justified.
The writer of the article disagrees with you, as well as many others.