From: "Little@man.Ball" <suck@ra.mentos>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: When Slapped Down Like a $2 Dolla Ho - Ski Bunny Surrenders
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:10:55 -0600
Organization: \@multiple personality phil hendry mind fuck@/
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:34:30 -0700
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> On 2024-04-23 11:13, AlleyCat wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:01:34 -0700, Alan says...
> >
> > I Can't Believe This Guy Is Allowed Out of His House - Thinks
> > "Solar Activity" Is ONLY Sunspot Activity
> >
> > On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 09:16:28 -0700, Alan says...
> >
> >> "Solar activity"? You mean sunspots, actually, right loser?
> >
> > No.
> >
> >> Yet that's the image you presented: nothing but sunspots counts.
> >
> > Nope. There are MANY passages in the videos that say "solar
> > activity" and NOT "sunspot activity" only. One video DOES say The
> > Danish Institute compiled a record of "sunspots", but that is NOT
> > the sole focus.
> >
> > Astrophysicists from Harvard University published the following
> > graph in the official journal of the American Geophysical Union.
> > The blue line represents temperature change in the Arctic over the
> > past hundred years and here is the rise in carbon dioxide over the
> > same period. The two are not obviously connected but now look again
> > at the temperature record and at this red line which depicts
> > variations in SOLAR ACTIVITY over the past century as recorded
> > independently by scientists from NASA and America's National
> > Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
> >
> > SOLAR ACTIVITY over the last hundred years over the last several
> > hundred years correlates very nicely on a decadal basis with sea
> > ice and Arctic temperatures.
> >
> > To the Harvard astrophysicists and many other scientists the
> > conclusion is inescapable.
>
> Except it wasn't "Harvard astrophysicists" (plural):
Yes it was:
> The article to which your video refers was published by ONE person.
Nope.
> Makes you wonder what else they're lying about...
Only to a troll like yourself who always lies.
.04% Co2 = irrelevant!