Davin News Server

From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: When Slapped Down Like a $2 Dolla Ho - Ski Bunny Surrenders
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 12:19:05 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider

On 2024-04-24 12:10, Little@man.Ball wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:34:30 -0700
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2024-04-23 11:13, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:01:34 -0700,  Alan says...
>>>
>>> I Can't Believe This Guy Is Allowed Out of His House - Thinks
>>> "Solar Activity" Is ONLY Sunspot Activity
>>>
>>> On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 09:16:28 -0700,  Alan says...
>>>    
>>>> "Solar activity"? You mean sunspots, actually, right loser?
>>>
>>> No.
>>>    
>>>> Yet that's the image you presented: nothing but sunspots counts.
>>>
>>> Nope. There are MANY passages in the videos that say "solar
>>> activity" and NOT "sunspot activity" only. One video DOES say The
>>> Danish Institute compiled a record of "sunspots", but that is NOT
>>> the sole focus.
>>>
>>> Astrophysicists from Harvard University published the following
>>> graph in the official journal of the American Geophysical Union.
>>> The blue line represents temperature change in the Arctic over the
>>> past hundred years and here is the rise in carbon dioxide over the
>>> same period. The two are not obviously connected but now look again
>>> at the temperature record and at this red line which depicts
>>> variations in SOLAR ACTIVITY over the past century as recorded
>>> independently by scientists from NASA and America's National
>>> Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
>>>
>>> SOLAR ACTIVITY over the last hundred years over the last several
>>> hundred years correlates very nicely on a decadal basis with sea
>>> ice and Arctic temperatures.
>>>
>>> To the Harvard astrophysicists and many other scientists the
>>> conclusion is inescapable.
>>
>> Except it wasn't "Harvard astrophysicists" (plural):
> 
> Yes it was:

Nope.

>   
>> The article to which your video refers was published by ONE person.
> 
> Nope.

Oh, loser...

Haven't you learned that I don't say these things if I can't prove them?

<https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2005GL023429>

Author: Willie W.-H. Soon.

This is not about that paper, but:

'In 2003, Willie Soon was first author on a review paper in the journal 
Climate Research, with Sallie Baliunas as co-author. This paper 
concluded that "the 20th century is probably not the warmest nor a 
uniquely extreme climatic period of the last millennium."[26][27]
Shortly thereafter, 13 scientists published a refutation of the paper.'

Oh, and more:

'Soon and Baliunas were also criticised because they did not disclose 
that their research was funded in part by the American Petroleum Institute.'

But, you keep right on losing.