From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: When Slapped Down Like a $2 Dolla Ho - Ski Bunny Surrenders
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:22:39 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-04-24 12:43, Little@man.Ball wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 12:19:05 -0700
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2024-04-24 12:10, Little@man.Ball wrote:
>>> On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:34:30 -0700
>>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2024-04-23 11:13, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:01:34 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>
>>>>> I Can't Believe This Guy Is Allowed Out of His House - Thinks
>>>>> "Solar Activity" Is ONLY Sunspot Activity
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 09:16:28 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Solar activity"? You mean sunspots, actually, right loser?
>>>>>
>>>>> No.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yet that's the image you presented: nothing but sunspots counts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope. There are MANY passages in the videos that say "solar
>>>>> activity" and NOT "sunspot activity" only. One video DOES say The
>>>>> Danish Institute compiled a record of "sunspots", but that is NOT
>>>>> the sole focus.
>>>>>
>>>>> Astrophysicists from Harvard University published the following
>>>>> graph in the official journal of the American Geophysical Union.
>>>>> The blue line represents temperature change in the Arctic over the
>>>>> past hundred years and here is the rise in carbon dioxide over the
>>>>> same period. The two are not obviously connected but now look
>>>>> again at the temperature record and at this red line which depicts
>>>>> variations in SOLAR ACTIVITY over the past century as recorded
>>>>> independently by scientists from NASA and America's National
>>>>> Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
>>>>>
>>>>> SOLAR ACTIVITY over the last hundred years over the last several
>>>>> hundred years correlates very nicely on a decadal basis with sea
>>>>> ice and Arctic temperatures.
>>>>>
>>>>> To the Harvard astrophysicists and many other scientists the
>>>>> conclusion is inescapable.
>>>>
>>>> Except it wasn't "Harvard astrophysicists" (plural):
>>>
>>> Yes it was:
>>
>> Nope.
>>
> Prove it.
>
I already did... ...but I don't mind doing it again:
<https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2005GL023429>
Author: Willie W.-H. Soon.
This is not about that paper, but:
'In 2003, Willie Soon was first author on a review paper in the journal
Climate Research, with Sallie Baliunas as co-author. This paper
concluded that "the 20th century is probably not the warmest nor a
uniquely extreme climatic period of the last millennium."[26][27]
Shortly thereafter, 13 scientists published a refutation of the paper.'
Oh, and more:
'Soon and Baliunas were also criticised because they did not disclose
that their research was funded in part by the American Petroleum Institute.'
But, you keep right on losing.