From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Liberal Try Liberal Bullshit Semantics... Fails Horribly
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 10:41:46 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-05-02 10:33, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2 May 2024 09:04:08 -0700, Alan says...
>
>>
>> On 2024-05-01 21:20, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 1 May 2024 21:11:23 -0700, Alan says...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-05-01 21:04, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 1 May 2024 17:47:49 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-04-27 09:43, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>> Expert's Eva Warning: 'One of The Biggest Energy Policy Blunders We've Ever
>>>>>>> Made'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Energy experts are warning about numerous potential issues for electric
>>>>>>> vehicles, including affordability, range, weather, infrastructure, and economic
>>>>>>> concerns, even as the government and car companies increasingly push them on
>>>>>>> Americans. [emphasis, links added]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bryan Dean Wright
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And what makes him an "expert" on this issue, loser?
>
> He was QUOTING th experts, dipshit... I never said HE was "the" expert. You
> don't HAVE to be an expert on ANY subject to report ABOUT experts and what THEY
> say.
>
Then you should have no problem telling me WHO he was quoting, loser.
> See? You just fuck everything up, trying to convolute the topic. You really
> have a screw loose, if you think the author of a story ABOUT experts, is the
> one I was saying was an expert.
>
>>>>>
>>>>> What makes YOU an expert, besides reading about it on the Internet, where...
>
>>>> I'm not pontificating about subjects and calling myself an "expert", loser.
>
> WHO did that?
>
>>> To tell or ask ANYONE about their credentials, means YOU must be a peer WITH
>>> the same or higher credentials to even ask or criticize, and you are not.
>>
>>
>> If I'm getting medical advice, you're suggesting I have to BE a doctor
>> in order to ask about that person's qualifications?
>
> You can ask for qualifications, but you KNOW that's not what I said, but you
> can't criticize, unless you KNOW what the fuck you're talking about, and you
> don't, seeing how you are not a fucking doctor, dumb ass.
That is EXACTLY what you just said:
"To tell or ask ANYONE about their credentials"
>
> You know that's not the gist of what I was saying. As two NON-experts, you and
> the other guy, you can neither say with conviction he's wrong and you're right,
> since you're BOTH not credentialed AS climate experts.
I'm not saying he's wrong.
I'm asking what are his qualifications to make his claims.