From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: can.politics,can.general
Subject: Re: Trump found in contempt for violating gag order in hush money
Date: Sun, 5 May 2024 12:39:17 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-05-05 12:32, Jonathan Small Balls wrote:
> On Sun, 5 May 2024 12:27:55 -0700
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2024-05-05 12:13, Jonathan Small Balls wrote:
>>> On Sun, 5 May 2024 10:18:14 -0700 Alan<nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Interesting that the NY Post quotes one part of the bill...
>>> https://mynbc15.com/news/nation-world/canadian-bill-could-imprison-people-for-life-for-promoting-genocide-this-is-insane-canada-arif-virani-hate-speech-discrimination-jail-conviction-elon-musk-margaret-atwood
>>>
>>> Those who promote hatred or antisemitism, including by downplaying,
>>> condoning or denying the Holocaust, would also face up to five years
>>> in prison under the legislation.
>>>
>>> https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-canadas-online-harms-act-is-revealing-itself-to-be-staggeringly/
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.foxnews.com/world/canadian-law-endorsed-trudeau-government-imprison-people-life-speech-crimes
>>>
>>> Introduced late last month, the Online Harms Act, or Bill C-63,
>>> would allow judges to imprison adults for life if they advocate for
>>> genocide.
>>>
>>> The law would also allow a provincial judge to impose house arrest
>>> and a fine if there were reasonable grounds to believe a defendant
>>> "will commit" an offense â a provision Wall Street Journal columnist
>>> Michael Taube likened to the 2002 film "Minority Report."
>>
>> That is, in actual fact...
>
> I know.
>
>
>> ...FALSE.
>
> Stop snipping, you weedy little Mac whore:
I'll do whatever I like.
It is false to claim that a judge can impose house arrest and a fine
simply for reasonable grounds to believe a defendant will commit an offense.